to make a story short,
sorry for bothering with this subject again.
but i must say i liked so much this article below:
http://milbert.com/articles/tubes_vs_transistors_in_electric_guitar_amps
and i do not understand why things like this are not well accepted.
but this not the point.
i would like to ask... the transistor amp might be the carvin SX series?
if it is true that it is a carvin, why the man behind the idea (john murphy) did not
used or suggested an equalization after the preamp (as he did in his article
about duty cycle modulation).
thanks
sorry for bothering with this subject again.
but i must say i liked so much this article below:
http://milbert.com/articles/tubes_vs_transistors_in_electric_guitar_amps
and i do not understand why things like this are not well accepted.
but this not the point.
i would like to ask... the transistor amp might be the carvin SX series?
if it is true that it is a carvin, why the man behind the idea (john murphy) did not
used or suggested an equalization after the preamp (as he did in his article
about duty cycle modulation).
thanks