Quote from: g1 on November 16, 2025, 10:46:16 AMI would see if you can verify switch contacts for bad ranges/functions.
Quote from: dmeek on November 12, 2025, 09:42:16 PMHere it isThanks so much!
You cannot view this attachment.
Quote from: aquataur on November 07, 2025, 05:05:11 AMWhat are you trying to protect your input from? Electrical damage?Bingo!
I guess you are trying to protect from artifacts that are bad sounding.
QuoteFor a predominantly clean system, op-amp clipping or -latch up might sound unpleasant and distracting. In this case, a fast acting limiter would be the cure. But then, how much headroom does this one have...This one is supplied by ±10.7 or so volts, due to use of a ±12V power supply from an old computer, which is rather noisy so I add some filtering, and that drops the voltage some. If I ever build this circuit proper, I'm going to use proper power transformers and regulators to make ±15V, which just may solve my problem, don't know yet.
QuoteFor a distorted system, subsequent distortion stages would mask everything.I beg to differ; For various reasons that I don't have time to explain, in the past I found myself doing tests attempting to find out if rail-clipping (in particular) leaves a "fingerprint" on the tone that you can hear even through a subsequent clipping engine. I don't know how or why, but it does.
QuoteFor benign "bounding", a string of zener diodes (anode to anode) with a 100R dropper resistor in series with the input would do the job, as Merlin has used it here.You know, I had thought of doing soft-clipping with Zeners (because they are made for different voltages, so you don't have to "stack" diodes to get your desired headroom), but wasn't sure how to implement it. Here you've provided the solution; I'll search around for more info on this arrangement, thank you!
Even on a clean system, a such limited transit would likely go unnoticed.