Solid State Guitar Amp Forum | DIY Guitar Amplifiers

Solid State Amplifiers => Preamps and Effects => Topic started by: Miyagi_83 on May 12, 2024, 04:45:06 PM

Title: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Miyagi_83 on May 12, 2024, 04:45:06 PM
Hi, everyone, first build-related post of mine  :) 
Soon, I'm going to build Joe Davisson's 4-stage Vulcan preamp using the schematic posted on his website and I have a few questions before I embark on this project.
1. Has anyone tried it?
2. If so, how does it sound? Judging by the number of gain stages, it's a hard rock / heavy metal machine.
3. I'm going to use BC337 transistors because I have a lot of them (not much of anything else tbh). Apart from pinout and biasing, is there anything I should specifically pay attention to?
I'm going to breadboard it first and, of course, I'll keep the forum updated on the progress. That, however, may take a while because adult life is the way it is ;)
Stay tuned.
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Umlaut on May 13, 2024, 09:37:01 AM
Hi there!
I have this one on my to-breadboard along the line.
Seems to be marshall-voiced, judging by the filtering, and pretty high gain.
Might be wrong, but perhaps the diodes mimic grid saturation as in a valve amp.

Indeed breadboard first, especially if using other trannies, and check the voltages. Personally I'd try snubber caps on the last two gain stages.

Good luck!
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Miyagi_83 on May 13, 2024, 10:36:32 AM
Thanks for the reply, Umlaut.
Looking at the schematic, I also expect it to sound like a Marshall on steroids. Like a DSL or a Bogner Ecstasy perhaps?
Speaking of snubber caps, do you mean in parallel with collector resistors?
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Umlaut on May 13, 2024, 01:37:34 PM
I'd try 10pF to 22pF, base to collector, similar to the trick employed to smooth down silicon transistors in fuzzes, but that's a matter of taste :)
I had a bit of downtime this arvo and threw the Vulcan on LtSpice: the frequency response is VERY similar to the Randall RG100Es, so you'll probably hot rodded marshall vibes. That doesnt mean that it will sound like a Randall, though: clipping thresholds and gain increments are very different.
I was also surprised to see that the circuit, as is, is already shaving off some dBs above 6kHz.
I'd be tempted to try it at higher voltages, with low hFE transistors, just for the sake of it.
Oh, and the diodes do mimic grid clipping: they chop almost half of the waveform before the gain stage. Very clever design with just a few parts :)
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Miyagi_83 on May 13, 2024, 04:05:53 PM
Thanks for all the info and hints. I'm about to order the parts that I don't have in my stash and as soon as they arrive, I'll start breadboarding. Provided nothing unexpected gets in the way, that is.
As far as the higher voltage goes, I happen to have an LT1054-based voltage doubler put together, so I'll give it a try at roughly 18V too.
Have a good one and stay tuned!
M
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Umlaut on May 17, 2024, 05:25:31 AM
Well I breadboarded it early this week out of curiosity. A few observations:
- 18V instead of 9 does not make much difference.
- bias is finicky, get as close to 4.5V as possible (using 2 resistors in series or a trimmer).
- while the voicing of this circuit is not exactly to my liking, it is undeniably well designed: tried other coupling caps, bypass caps and so on, and it quicky went south. Only tried stuff for about 20min, though.
- snubber caps collector-to-base -> Nope. A 2.2n cap across the last collector bias resistor worked MUCH better to tame the highs.
- somebody at DIYStompboxes suggested using other diodes. I tried BAT85 and it sounded pretty good.

I will have to revisit it at some point during summer, as it definitely has a nice vibe. Hope this helps!
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Miyagi_83 on May 20, 2024, 04:00:06 PM
Hey, Umlaut.
It's great that you've been able to breadboard and play it. Thanks a lot for all your input. It's going to save me, and possibly others, some time.
My parts came in this afternoon and I'm looking forward to breadboarding it myself, but it's going to have to wait a bit. Hopefully, no longer than two weeks.
Oh, and I found some BC550's the other day. I might give them a whirl too.

I also have a couple of questions:
1. Did you use the 2N5089 transistors?
2. Now that you have some hands-on (and ears-on) experience, how to would you describe the voicing of this preamp?

M.
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Umlaut on May 21, 2024, 02:06:03 AM
Yes, I did use 2N5089. I tried 2N3904 but it did not work as well :P
BC550 should give you a similar result to 89s though.
Bear in mind that I tinkered with it for less than 1h, so it was a bit of a summary test.
As for the voicing, I'd say marshall-ish with a raw, unfiltered edge to it. Into the right amp it can sound quite nice (think Black Sabbath, Pentagram, etc), but I prefer a bit more filtering and tone-shaping. While it sounds quite full and "amp-like" (not a term that I like, but...), and it has a nicer feel than your standard boss disto-box, I would still be partial to other multi-stage pedals like the AMT Legend ones, for example (check on FSB for schematics).
Oh, I tested it on the clean channel of my Peavey Bandit silver stripe, low input and bright switch off, which is an amazing pedal platform IMO.
Yesterday I was fiddling with a distortion circuit of mine which is quite similar in its topology and voicing, but using LND150 depletion mosfets. To my ears, they sound much more pleasant than BJTs in this kind of cascading gain stage circuits. I will probably post it at some point in the coming days, as I am pleased enough with it to share it  :)
Again, breadboard and see for yourself! lotsa fun can be had with this circuit, whether you tinker with the values or not.
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Miyagi_83 on May 21, 2024, 02:37:44 AM
Thanks a lot. I really appreciate your help and support. I'll keep you posted on my progress.
M.
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Miyagi_83 on May 22, 2024, 08:39:19 AM
So, I did some breadboarding today to find collector resistors for my BC337's. I've found a set of 4 that bias very close to 4.5 VDC with a 22k in the collector.
I didn't bother to look for the 5th one because it's an emitter follower. Should I do it? Also, should I increase the value of the buffer stage's emitter resistor from 10k to 22k?
Next step is to put the whole thing together on the breadboard.
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Umlaut on May 22, 2024, 04:18:37 PM
If you are talking about the last bjt, emitter follower indeed, I wouldn't go above 10k unless I wanted to purposefully introduce "cathode follower"-ish distortion.
FWIW I breadboarded the 3-stage version of this circuit, not the 4-stage one, and there was plenty of gain and still some wiggle room to push it with a TS without turning into white noise. YMMV :)
Oh, and ref. biasing, nothing wrong with using 2 resistors in series to get to the right bias either.
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Miyagi_83 on May 22, 2024, 06:24:29 PM
Yeah, I meant the last stage, the emitter follower. I'll leave the load resistor at 10k then.
Speaking of the 3-stage BJT version, I kinda know how that thing sounds because there is a video of it on YouTube and, indeed, it does display the quality you described earlier. Still, I'd like to (and am going to) try the 4-stage preamp because I'm curious what it can do. There are no clips that I was able to find so I might become the first one to upload some :D
I started putting the circuit together on my breadboard, but I needed to take it apart halfway through because a lot of the connectors were overly loose, so I figured I'd retension them. Should have checked that first...
I might have some time to get back to working on it this weekend.
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Miyagi_83 on May 22, 2024, 06:34:09 PM
Quote from: Umlaut on May 22, 2024, 04:18:37 PMOh, and ref. biasing, nothing wrong with using 2 resistors in series to get to the right bias either.

The 337's I tried today were very consistent, or maybe that's just my limited experience. Out of the 15-ish pieces I tested, one biased at 4.44 V, the five I selected are between 4.51 and 4.55 V, and the rest gave a reading of around 4.6 V. All that with 1k emitter resistor, 22k collector resistor, and the 4.7M / 1N4148 / 1M network connected to the base, as per Joe Davisson's schematic.
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Miyagi_83 on May 25, 2024, 09:23:39 AM
Ok, so here's an update.

I've put it together on my breadboard and performed a sound test. It is VERY promising. I might tweak the tone stack a tad, but, man, does this thing sound powerful!! Perhaps not an uber-extreme-downtuned-modern-metal kind of powerful but great nonetheless. Great job, Mr. Davisson!
I've made a quick recording at a baby-sleeping-in-the-next-room volume. I'll upload it later, on SoundCloud perhaps, and post the link here.
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Miyagi_83 on May 25, 2024, 12:27:42 PM
EDIT: the link posted previously was strange. To say the least. Now it should be fine
https://m.soundcloud.com/user-996907905/joe_davisson_vulcan_preamp_bc3

Ok, here it is.
Guitar: LTD MH 50 with pickups from Dean Vendetta 2
Amp: single-ended EL91 Fender Champ-a-like
Speakers: some 1980s 12" marked Celetion (sic!)
Settings change as I go. I do not touch the guitar's volume knob, I just play with the knobs on the preamp.
The values of I used for the tone stack, presence and level are different than those on Mr. Davisson's schematic because I only had pots for tube amps. All caps have been scaled accordingly.
Enjoy.
Oh, and please forgive my sloppy playing 😅 I don't play as much as I used to...
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: joecool85 on May 27, 2024, 08:56:13 PM
For those looking for the link to the schematic: https://www.diystompboxes.com/analogalchemy/sch/vulcan.html

I'm curious what the diodes are for between the stages though.  Not sure I've seen that before.
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Miyagi_83 on May 28, 2024, 02:23:48 AM
Hi, joecool85.
Sorry about not posting the schematic or link. I should have done it in my first post. My bad.
Actually, it's this one
https://www.diystompboxes.com/analogalchemy/sch/v4preamp.html
The one you provided shows the 3-stage bjt Vulcan overdrive pedal and they sound completely different.
As for the diodes, I used 1N4148.
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Miyagi_83 on May 29, 2024, 09:13:26 AM
Update

So, I have been tweaking the circuit for the past couple of days and I think I've got it where I like it. Actually, there are a few versions that I'm fond of, so I'm going to make it a switchable two or three-channel preamp. Honestly, this design has enormous potential, afaic. I haven't tried it on 18V yet. That's still on my to-do list.
Now I'm going to need a nice clean channel to pair with it. Any suggestions are welcome.

Is it OK to post a schematic with my changes? On his site, Joe Davisson put the 'do not copy / all rights reserved' clause, so I wouldn't like to infringe his copyrights, annoy him or anything like that, hence my question.
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: edvard on June 01, 2024, 09:55:05 PM
Quote from: joecool85 on May 27, 2024, 08:56:13 PMFor those looking for the link to the schematic: https://www.diystompboxes.com/analogalchemy/sch/vulcan.html

I'm curious what the diodes are for between the stages though.  Not sure I've seen that before.

Per the description below the schematic; "The diodes in the bias network prevent hard-saturation of the transistors."

I won't pretend I'm smart enough to know how that works, but it sounds to be in the same vein of putting a diode across base & emitter to prevent zener breakdown events that degrade the junction and cause noise to build up over time.
See here: https://www.diystompboxes.com/smfforum/index.php?topic=132039.0

I wonder if those two arrangements might be considered general good practices for BJT-based preamp circuits?
 
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Loudthud on June 01, 2024, 10:37:31 PM
Generally, to prevent hard saturation of transistors (the kind that takes significant time to undo) you install a Schottky or Germanium diode between Base and Collector. I question whether it makes an audible difference in an audio circuit. The way this guy has installed the diodes, it makes sure any big negative input is able to degrade the Base-Emitter junction. 
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: edvard on June 01, 2024, 10:45:18 PM
Quote from: Miyagi_83 on May 29, 2024, 09:13:26 AMUpdate

So, I have been tweaking the circuit for the past couple of days and I think I've got it where I like it. Actually, there are a few versions that I'm fond of, so I'm going to make it a switchable two or three-channel preamp. Honestly, this design has enormous potential, afaic. I haven't tried it on 18V yet. That's still on my to-do list.
Now I'm going to need a nice clean channel to pair with it. Any suggestions are welcome.

I've asked before on other forums that if there were such thing as a "clean channel" pedal, what would it consist of, and most folks suggested either completely dry, like plugging into the power section with a tone control, or light-to-medium compression with no clipping.

QuoteIs it OK to post a schematic with my changes? On his site, Joe Davisson put the 'do not copy / all rights reserved' clause, so I wouldn't like to infringe his copyrights, annoy him or anything like that, hence my question.

He hangs mostly at diystompboxes.com, maybe pop in there and send him a personal message.  At the very least, I'd say draw your own schematic and highlight the differences, so you won't be straight-up copying.  Maybe include "modified from Joe Davisson's Vulcan" and a link to his page.
IANAL, so I'd ask him about it first.
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Miyagi_83 on June 02, 2024, 03:46:50 AM
Quote from: edvard on June 01, 2024, 10:45:18 PMI've asked before on other forums that if there were such thing as a "clean channel" pedal, what would it consist of, and most folks suggested either completely dry, like plugging into the power section with a tone control, or light-to-medium compression with no clipping.


Thanks for the tip. There are a couple of ideas I've been looking at, like the Fetzer Valve with a tone stack, Rod Elliott's preamp, or Umlaut's Keelhauler. I'll start a new thread once I've found what I'm looking for.

QuoteHe hangs mostly at diystompboxes.com, maybe pop in there and send him a personal message.  At the very least, I'd say draw your own schematic and highlight the differences, so you won't be straight-up copying.  Maybe include "modified from Joe Davisson's Vulcan" and a link to his page.
IANAL, so I'd ask him about it first.


I sent him a PM this morning. We'll see what he says.
Title: Re: Joe Davisson's Vulcan preamp
Post by: Miyagi_83 on June 03, 2024, 06:21:59 AM
Here's a schematic of Joe's preamp tweaked to my liking. It's the way it is on my breadboard at the moment. To date, I have tried a few different combinations and this is one of my favorites.
Here's the original design
https://www.diystompboxes.com/analogalchemy/sch/v4preamp.html

As you can see, aside from different transistors and their collector resistors, I ditched two emitter bypass caps (3rd and 4th stages) and changed the values of the other two (1st and 2nd stages). I added bright caps here and there and changed tone stack capacitors. Also the TS potentiometers are higher value because these are the only ones I have. Oh, and my mid pot is 50k.
Many thanks to Joe Davisson for sharing his idea with the interwebs.
M.