Welcome to Solid State Guitar Amp Forum | DIY Guitar Amplifiers. Please login or sign up.

March 28, 2024, 03:03:35 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Recent Posts

 

Recent posts

#11
Amplifier Discussion / Re: Acoustic 134 reverb
Last post by Pete - March 25, 2024, 01:10:34 PM
Thanks, really appreciate the input and suggestions. I'm not trying to keep the amp close to original. Just want it to be working and useful.

Some comments/questions on your suggestions:

1. Why so important to keep the power resistors so close to PCB/power transistors? Will moving them 10" away, with robust conductors, really cause a problem?

2. The 4 output transistors mounted on the chassis (2N3055) don't seem to get very hot, so not sure if I need to move them. (It's the 40410 transistor and the 2 power resistors that seem to be generating most of the heat.)

3. What's the advantage of putting a speed control on vent fan? Maybe just a 120v disc thermostat?
#12
Amplifier Discussion / Re: Acoustic 134 reverb
Last post by Tassieviking - March 25, 2024, 11:48:32 AM
I have a few quick questions for you, do you want to keep this amp as close as you can to original or do you mind changing some things ?
I personally would do the following if it was mine.
1: Change the mains cable to one with earth and get rid of that deadly earth switch.
2: The power resistors should be mounted as close to the PCB or power transistors as you can.
3: Remove the power transistors from the side of the chassis and mount a heat-sink inside in front of the fan and mount transistors and resistors there. the airflow will help a lot. The heat-sink should be right on top of the stud sticking up of the floor for best positioning with the fins towards the fan.
4: make the fan variable speed with a speed controller, if it is DC then Joecool85 has a nice little speed control circuit in here somewhere that would work great.
5: make a hole and put a grommet in it so you can mount a large 3 spring tank in the bottom of the cabinet, or mount 2 RCA sockets on the chassis so you can plug the reverb in from outside. (you might need insulated sockets so they don't short out to the chassis.

Its looking great so far.

#13
Amplifier Discussion / Re: SZ13C zener replacement fo...
Last post by fazeka - March 25, 2024, 01:42:33 AM
Update: just finished the refurb of the T60.

Appears to be an October or November '64 as it has the link added (late Sept. '64) but still has R14 = 330k (changed to 82k in mid Dec. '64).

Good amount of work put in and it's not the most desirable of JMIs but if it means keeping it out of the dumpster then it's worth it.

Was in a rather sad state upon arrival but gave it some TLC and it turned out pretty good, best it's probably been in decades I reckon.

Everything disassembled and cleaned. Front of the chassis was bashed in but was carefully "body worked" nearly straight. Also took care of the various front panel dents.

Replaced all the electrolytics, a few of the input resistors, rectifiers, the zener and the output transistors. Used MJ15025s and rebiased according to R.G. here.

Plastic power switch bat was broken off so replaced that with a Carling. Also, the voltage selector was cracked and non-functional so it's hardwired to 115 VAC (US).

Still needs a few minor things to finish 'er up (hardwire the speaker cable and mains cable, etc.). Sounds pretty good, actually!

Output before clip is 33W @ 9.5 ohms (that's what the big wirewound resistor I have measures at), 26W @ 16 ohms. "T60" (as in 60 watts), huh? ::) Hah! ;D 

Anyone got a spare empty T60 head cab lying about?  :)



#14
Amplifier Discussion / Re: Acoustic 134 reverb
Last post by Pete - March 24, 2024, 04:27:03 PM
Yessir you are correct, the 134 has a cabinet with 4 x 10" Eminence speakers.

If you know Acoustics well, you'll def see some mods here (pic attached) – vents and a small fan installed, also the 10w resistors on the power PC board have been changed to 25w chassis-mount. All to try and dissipate some heat. Still need to find a new place for the filter cap, but should be easy. The newer ones aren't as big as a farm silo  :D 

From what I've read these amps tend to run pretty hot, and a real design flaw (in my opinion) is there's almost no way for them to cool - there's no venting or means to breathe AT ALL once the head is installed in the cabinet.

From what I can tell (might be wrong) it appears the OEM reverb tank was a small one mounted inside the head. I suppose a 17" tank could be shoehorned in here (the inside width is about 23"), but it would probably be touching the main transformer and be very close to Q302 (40410), both of which seem to run hot (especially Q302). So I'd rather defer to a smaller tank to allow as much breathing room as possible. Having said that, I like your suggestion of mounting the tank outside the head in the cabinet; might consider it. I have a modest background in electronics but am not real familiar with guitar amps & reverb tanks.

This unit has been neglected and abused over the years, and clearly others have worked on it. It hasn't worked in 15-20 years; the drive transformer was blown and after searching for one unsuccessfully for years (as it sat in my attic), I decided to just rewind the bad one. I've already had it up and running so I think that was a [surprising] success. It def needs some TLC, and I really hope to get it working for good. These amps apparently competed with the Marshalls back in the day.

Just finishing up a recap; we'll see how it goes after that. Still need to see if I can get some solid hours of running time without something burning up before I invest in a reverb tank. If it seems to run really hot I may be back here looking for some additional ideas and help ...   :)  :)

(The data sheet on the Q40410 says it can operate up to 200 C. It's running well below that at around 110 C. Still, that's pretty hot. Not sure if that's normal for this amp or if there's another issue somewhere. I'm concerned that kind of heat can damage nearby components on the PCB.)
#15
Amplifier Discussion / Re: Acoustic 134 reverb
Last post by Tassieviking - March 24, 2024, 02:19:35 PM
I thought that the Model 134 was a combo with 4 10" speakers in it, if not then maybe someone has modded it to be a head.
I was going to suggest you place the reverb tank in the bottom under the speakers but I guess that's out if you only have a head with no speakers.
The combo is supposed to be 25" wide so I thought the amp chassis would be at least 23" wide.
Would you mind posting some pictures of your 134 for us ?
There are not many pics of Model 134 amps that show the insides properly.
(And we love amp porn,...I mean Amp pictures) :)  :)  :)
Cheers
Mick
#16
Amplifier Discussion / Re: Acoustic 134 reverb
Last post by g1 - March 23, 2024, 08:09:02 PM
Yes, either will be close enough.  Looks like 8EB2C1A is available.
#17
Amplifier Discussion / Re: Acoustic 134 reverb
Last post by Pete - March 23, 2024, 02:24:43 PM
My next challenge is the physical size. The 4 series tanks are 17" long, which will not fit in this head. I probably need an 8 series, but there's nothing offered in that series which exactly matches the impedances of the 4FB (1475 ohms in, 2250 out)

8E series is 800 ohms in, 2575 out
8F series is 1925 ohms in, 2575 out

Do you think either of these will work? 
#18
Amplifier Discussion / Re: Acoustic 134 reverb
Last post by g1 - March 22, 2024, 06:46:49 PM
Quote from: Pete on March 22, 2024, 05:19:52 PMSooo ... the 4EB2C1B is an interesting suggestion. Can this be mounted either way? – Open side up or open side down?

I don't think they are all that fussy about it, I have seen manufacturers using tanks 'upside down' to what they are supposed to be.  Maybe when they get old and saggy they might start to bottom out.
But if the correct one is available, you might as well get that.
Studio Sound Electronics seems to have them all, including the 4FB series which would be an even better impedance match.  And they have them available in several decay times.
#19
Amplifier Discussion / Re: Acoustic 134 reverb
Last post by Pete - March 22, 2024, 05:19:52 PM
Thanks everyone for the replies!

The Acoustic 134 is a solid state amp so I'm not sure how much benefit there would be comparing its circuitry to a tube amp.

The reverb tank is horizontal mount, open side up, so according to the current numbering system wouldn't a compatible replacement need to end (7th character) with the letter "A"?

I have the schematic for the 134 and the reverb driver circuit is exactly the same as what's shown for the 150. (I've read that the 134 and 150 were the same head with different cabinets.)

Sooo ... the 4EB2C1B is an interesting suggestion. Can this be mounted either way? – Open side up or open side down?
#20
Amplifier Discussion / Re: Acoustic 134 reverb
Last post by g1 - March 22, 2024, 01:17:02 PM
This listing shows a Gibbs 2 spring unit with about 200 ohms DC resistance at each end.  That would put it in the 4EB or 4FB range of tanks, I think a 4EB2C1B should work.

https://reverb.com/item/51673468-acoustic-control-corp-260-150-136-amplifier-gibbs-hammond-reverb-tank-unit-1969