Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - g1

#1
As a general rule, if it's a cap issue the hum should be 120Hz.  60Hz hum would be more likely ground issues, as outlined by phatt above.
#2
Tubes and Hybrids / Re: Another standby switch thread
January 05, 2025, 02:03:14 PM
Quote from: saturated on January 05, 2025, 05:56:58 AMAlso it is toob rectified if it matters
Yes it matters.  With solid-state rectifier you do not want to hit the tube's plates with instant DC voltage before the heaters warm up, so standby is a way to deal with this.
With tube-rectifier, the DC builds up slowly while the heaters are warming up, so you don't really need a standby switch.
#3
The T has the metal tab, the TF is fully plastic encapsulated, so no insulator required.
Not sure if the metal style transfers heat better to the heatsink.
#4
Quote from: Paul Marossy on December 28, 2024, 07:18:26 PMSo despite the notion that any old FET should work, this circuit is very picky about what FET it will accept.
Not sure where that was said.  'Any old' would still require it be n-channel jfet with same pinout.
2N5952 has a different pinout than the PN4093 or J113, so it will not work if installed with the same orientation.
#5
I guess it does not have a 3-prong AC plug with chassis connected to ground pin?
#6
Quote from: saturated on December 24, 2024, 02:00:42 PMAfter a little research maybe it's possibly a TDA2030 or LM1875 ?
TDA2030 was what I was thinking as well.  Here is their G10XL schematic which may be similar.
#7
Sounds like phantom power for condenser mics.  Modern stuff uses 48V for phantom.
#8
One thing I noticed on the layout, the fets have the middle leg bent forward, whereas the small bipolars have the middle leg bent to the back.
Since the fets had all been changed out by someone else previously, make sure they are not installed 'backwards'.
#9
Agree with JM that there may be other issues rather than the fets which are just being used as switches.

A jfet is low resistance (or 'on') in a non-powered state (or when no voltage applied at gate).  These are N-channel so they require a negative voltage at their gate pin to turn them 'off'.
Source to drain resistance should measure less than 100 ohms with amp un-powered.
Removing the fet from the circuit will simulate the fet in it's 'off' state (which is high resistance from source to drain).
#10
The Newcomer's Forum / Re: Newbz and DC power supplies
December 18, 2024, 02:03:37 PM
Quote from: saturated on December 17, 2024, 04:20:47 PMI'm trying to decipher terminals that show up in the pictures 🖼� of many of them

I have attempted to identify and lable appropriately....

What the heck is S- and S+ ?
I can't guarantee that this is correct, but seems to make 'sense'.  :)

https://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/threads/open-chassis-power-supply-connections-s-and-s.69047/
#11
Quote from: argenta on December 17, 2024, 10:08:16 PMSo here's an update. On replacing all 4 power transistors, I eliminated the loud switch on pop.
No you did not eliminate the turn on pop. 
As soon as you turned on the amp it blew.  There is probably DC on the output, which is why you hear the hum.  If you keep running it with DC at the output, it will burn out the speaker as well.
#12
Please post the schematic you are using.
#13
@vintagelove , as you mentioned, it seems they are getting away with using the TO92 devices for drivers in this case.  But this is the only amp I think I have ever seen doing so.  In my experience anything using bi-polar output devices has something heftier than TO-92 for drivers. 
Also, a lot of times the drivers are replaced when the outputs are blown, even if they check ok, as they will have been stressed.  It's possible this has been done on some of the 'blown output' repairs without being reported.
#14
Other tubeworks amps that used Fet's for outputs had the 2N5401/5551 drivers.
Probably a lot less drive current required for Fet gates.
I wonder if they might have just stuck with them for this model because "we're already doing it that way"?

examples attached.
#15
Quote from: vintagelove on December 15, 2024, 03:54:31 PMThe thing is I came across a post from a well respected gentleman who suggested these parts were not up to the task and unreliable in this position.
That will have been JM Fahey over at MEF.  He will probably be around shortly and maybe will expand on the issue.  :)